Validation of the Physical Activity Scale for Individuals With Physical Disabilities

Rita Van den Berg - Emons, AAMHJ L'Ortye, Laurien Buffart, Channah Nieuwenhuijsen, Carla Nooijen, Michael Bergen, Henk Stam, Hans Bussmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

van den Berg-Emons RJ, L'Ortye AA, Buffart LM, Nieuwenhuijsen C, Nooijen CF, Bergen MP, Stam HI, Bussmann JB. Validation of the Physical Activity Scale for Individuals With Physical Disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92:923-8. Objective: To determine the criterion validity of the Physical Activity Scale for Individuals With Physical Disabilities (PASIPD) by means of daily physical activity levels measured by using a validated accelerometry-based activity monitor in a large group of persons with a physical disability. Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Participants' home environment. Participants: Ambulatory and nonambulatory persons with cerebral palsy, meningomyelocele, or spinal cord injury (N=124). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Self-reported physical activity level measured by using the PASIPD, a 2-day recall questionnaire, was correlated to objectively measured physical activity level measured by using a validated accelerometry-based activity monitor. Results: Significant Spearman correlation coefficients between the PASIPD and activity monitor outcome measures ranged from .22 to .37. The PASIPD overestimated the duration of physical activity measured by using the activity monitor (mean +/- SD, 3.9+/-2.9 vs 1.5+/-0.9h/d; P<.01). Significant correlation (rho=.74; P<.01) was found between average number of hours of physical activity per day measured by using the 2 methods and difference in hours between methods. This indicates larger overestimation for persons with higher activity levels. Conclusions: The PASIPD correlated poorly with objective measurements using an accelerometry-based activity monitor in people with a physical disability. However, similar low correlations between objective and subjective activity measurements have been found in the general population. Users of the PASIPD should be cautious about overestimating physical activity levels.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)923-928
Number of pages6
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume92
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Research programs

  • EMC MUSC-01-46-01

Cite this