Value of Laparoscopy for Resection of Small-Bowel Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Including Central Mesenteric Lymphadenectomy

Enes Kaçmaz, Susanne Van Eeden, Josephina C.C. Koppes, Heinz Josef Klümpen, Willem A. Bemelman, Els J.M. Nieveen Van Dijkum, Anton F. Engelsman, Pieter J. Tanis*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: 

Literature on laparoscopic resection of small-bowel neuroendocrine neoplasms consists of single case descriptions or small selected case-series only, likely because of challenging mesenteric lymphadenectomy. 

OBJECTIVE: 

We evaluated an institutional change in approach from open to laparoscopic resection of small-bowel neuroendocrine neoplasm independent from lymph node involvement. 

DESIGN: 

This is a retrospective comparative cohort study. 

SETTING: 

This study was conducted at a tertiary referral center. 

PATIENTS: 

Patients with small-bowel neuroendocrine neoplasms were included. 

INTERVENTIONS: 

Laparoscopic or open segmental bowel resection with central mesenteric lymphadenectomy was the studied intervention. 

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 

Complexity of lymphadenectomy was assessed by determining the distance between suspect lymph nodes and main mesenteric branches on preoperative CT. Number of (tumor-positive) lymph nodes, conversion to open surgery, and postoperative complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification and length of stay were measured. 

RESULTS: 

A total of 34 patients were identified, of whom 11 (32%) underwent open and 23 (68%) laparoscopic surgery. Distances between lymph nodes and main mesenteric branches and number of examined and tumor-positive lymph nodes did not differ significantly. Laparoscopy was converted in 7 patients (30%). Major postoperative complications (grades 3-5) occurred in 1 patient (9%) in the open surgery group (grade 5) and 2 patients (9%) in the laparoscopic surgery group (grade 3b). The length of stay was 8 days (range, 6-18 d) in the open surgery group and 4 days (4-8 d) in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.036). LIMITATIONS: Long-term outcomes could not reliably be assessed because of the relatively short follow-up time of the laparoscopy group.

CONCLUSIONS: 

Laparoscopic bowel resection with central mesenteric lymphadenectomy for small-bowel neuroendocrine neoplasm appears safe and associated with similar pathologic outcome and shorter length of stay in the setting of a tertiary referral center. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B512.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1240-1248
Number of pages9
JournalDiseases of the Colon and Rectum
Volume64
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2021
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Value of Laparoscopy for Resection of Small-Bowel Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Including Central Mesenteric Lymphadenectomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this