TY - JOUR
T1 - Velopharyngeal dysfunction and speech-related characteristics in craniofacial microsomia
T2 - a retrospective analysis of 223 patients
AU - Renkema, R. W.
AU - Ramdat Misier, K. R.R.
AU - Rooijers, W.
AU - Osolos, A.
AU - de Gier, H. H.W.
AU - Poldermans, H. G.
AU - Padwa, B. L.
AU - Dunaway, D. J.
AU - Caron, C. J.J.M.
AU - Koudstaal, M. J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/9
Y1 - 2024/9
N2 - This study aimed to document the prevalence, severity, and risk factors of velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) in craniofacial microsomia (CFM) and to analyse differences in VPD-related speech characteristics between CFM patients without cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P), CFM patients with CL/P, and CL/P patients without CFM (control). A total of 223 patients with CFM were included, of whom 59 had a CL/P. Thirty-four CFM patients had VPD, including 20 with a CL/P. VPD was significantly more prevalent in CFM with CL/P than in CFM without CL/P (odds ratio (OR) 4.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9–8.7; P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression showed a significant association between CL/P and VPD in CFM patients (OR 7.4, 95% CI 2.1–26.3; P = 0.002). The presence of VPD was not associated with sex, the laterality or severity of CFM. Speech problems related to VPD appeared to be similar among the different groups (CFM without CL/P, CFM with CL/P, CL/P without CFM). As 15.2% of all CFM patients and 8.5% of CFM patients without CL/P had VPD, it is proposed that all patients with CFM, with or without CL/P, should be assessed by a speech and language therapist for the potential risk of VPD.
AB - This study aimed to document the prevalence, severity, and risk factors of velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) in craniofacial microsomia (CFM) and to analyse differences in VPD-related speech characteristics between CFM patients without cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P), CFM patients with CL/P, and CL/P patients without CFM (control). A total of 223 patients with CFM were included, of whom 59 had a CL/P. Thirty-four CFM patients had VPD, including 20 with a CL/P. VPD was significantly more prevalent in CFM with CL/P than in CFM without CL/P (odds ratio (OR) 4.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9–8.7; P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression showed a significant association between CL/P and VPD in CFM patients (OR 7.4, 95% CI 2.1–26.3; P = 0.002). The presence of VPD was not associated with sex, the laterality or severity of CFM. Speech problems related to VPD appeared to be similar among the different groups (CFM without CL/P, CFM with CL/P, CL/P without CFM). As 15.2% of all CFM patients and 8.5% of CFM patients without CL/P had VPD, it is proposed that all patients with CFM, with or without CL/P, should be assessed by a speech and language therapist for the potential risk of VPD.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85190515917&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijom.2024.04.001
DO - 10.1016/j.ijom.2024.04.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 38631989
AN - SCOPUS:85190515917
SN - 0901-5027
VL - 53
SP - 746
EP - 751
JO - International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
JF - International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
IS - 9
ER -