Verifying different-modality properties for concepts produces switching costs

Diane Pecher*, René Zeelenberg, Lawrence W. Barsalou

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

257 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

According to perceptual symbol systems, sensorimotor simulations underlie the representation of concepts. It follows that sensorimotor phenomena should arise in conceptual processing. Previous studies have shown that switching from one modality to another during perceptual processing incurs a processing cost. If perceptual simulation underlies conceptual processing, then verifying the properties of concepts should exhibit a switching cost as well. For example, verifying a property in the auditory modality (e.g., BLENDER-loud) should be slower after verifying a property in a different modality (e.g., CRANBERRIES-tart) than after verifying a property in the same modality (e.g., LEAVES-rustling). Only words were presented to subjects, and there were no instructions to use imagery. Nevertheless, switching modalities incurred a cost, analogous to the cost of switching modalities in perception. A second experiment showed that this effect was not due to associative priming between properties in the same modality. These results support the hypothesis that perceptual simulation underlies conceptual processing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)119-124
Number of pages6
JournalPsychological Science
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2003

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Verifying different-modality properties for concepts produces switching costs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this