Abstract
We studied children with cancer who receive vincristine chemotherapy as a one-hour infusion and compared them to children who received vincristine as a push injection. We investigated if there was a difference in the development of vincristine induced peripheral neuropathy, the most common side effect of vincristine. We found that in general there were no differences between the two groups (one-hour group versus push group). However, in children using both vincristine and azole antifungals, we noticed that children who received vincristine as a one-hour infusion experienced less severe vincristine induced peripheral neuropathy compared to children who received vincristine as a push injection. Therefore, in children who require both azole antifungal medication as well as vincristine it might be beneficial to administer the vincristine as a one-hour infusion instead of a push injection. However, this finding needs to be confirmed in other studies as well.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 3745 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Cancers |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 12 Dec 2020 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Research programs
- EMC MM-02-54-03
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy in pediatric oncology: A randomized controlled trial comparing push injections with one-hour infusions (The VINCA Trial)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver