We don't know what you did last summer. On the importance of transparent reporting of reaction time data pre-processing

Hannah D. Loenneker, Erin M. Buchanan, Ana Martinovici, Maximilian A. Primbs, Mahmoud M. Elsherif, Bradley J. Baker, Leonie A. Dudda, Dušica F. Đurđević, Ksenija Mišić, Hannah K. Peetz, Jan P. Röer, Lars Schulze, Lisa Wagner, Julia K. Wolska, Corinna Kührt, Ekaterina Pronizius*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In behavioral, cognitive, and social sciences, reaction time measures are an important source of information. However, analyses on reaction time data are affected by researchers' analytical choices and the order in which these choices are applied. The results of a systematic literature review, presented in this paper, revealed that the justification for and order in which analytical choices are conducted are rarely reported, leading to difficulty in reproducing results and interpreting mixed findings. To address this methodological shortcoming, we created a checklist on reporting reaction time pre-processing to make these decisions more explicit, improve transparency, and thus, promote best practices within the field. The importance of the pre-processing checklist was additionally supported by an expert consensus survey and a multiverse analysis. Consequently, we appeal for maximal transparency on all methods applied and offer a checklist to improve replicability and reproducibility of studies that use reaction time measures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)14-37
Number of pages24
JournalCortex
Volume172
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'We don't know what you did last summer. On the importance of transparent reporting of reaction time data pre-processing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this