What do people talk about when they talk about experiencing safety?

Jelle Brands*, Ilona Suojanen, Janne van Doorn

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter/Conference proceedingChapterAcademic

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Current discussions on the ways people experience safety in urban public spaces are often characterised by a negative view—the absence of unsafety—and rarely include positive sensations related to the safety experience itself. Some scholars have argued that this could be an artefact of more or less standardised methods used in the field. In fact, perceived safety and fear of crime are most often studied as disconnected from people’s everyday lives and practices, with little room provided for research participants to formulate what safety actually means to them in their circumstances. Although standardised approaches provide us with an intensity of the safety experience, all underlying ideas, meanings, sensations and perceptions are commonly forced into a single numerical rating. In order to gain insight into these aspects of the safety experience, we present the results of a bottom-up explorative approach in which participants were asked to freely describe what it means for them to feel safe. We detected three main themes: the absence of negative aspects, the presence of positive aspects and not having to think about safety. In our final section we reflect on the importance and usefulness of these findings for management, policymaking and academia.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAdvanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications
PublisherSpringer-Verlag
Pages67-81
Number of pages15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Aug 2020

Publication series

SeriesAdvanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications
ISSN1613-5113

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What do people talk about when they talk about experiencing safety?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this