TY - JOUR
T1 - When do procedural fairness and outcome fairness interact to influence employees' work attitudes and behaviors? The moderation effect of uncertainty.
AU - De Cremer, D (David)
AU - Brockner, J
AU - Fishman, A
AU - van Dijke, Marius
AU - van Olffen, W (Woody)
AU - Mayer, DM
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Prior research has shown that procedural fairness interacts with outcome fairness to influence employees¿ work attitudes (e.g., organizational commitment) and behaviors (e.g., job performance, organizational citizenship behavior), such that employees¿ tendencies to respond more positively to higher procedural fairness are stronger when outcome fairness is relatively low. In the present studies, we posited that people¿s uncertainty about their standing as organizational members would have a moderating influence on this interactive relationship between procedural fairness and outcome fairness, in that the interactive relationship was expected to be more pronounced when uncertainty was high. Using different operationalizations of uncertainty of standing (i.e., length of tenure as a proxy, along with self-reports and coworkers¿ reports), we found support for this hypothesis in 4 field studies spanning 3 different countries. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)
AB - Prior research has shown that procedural fairness interacts with outcome fairness to influence employees¿ work attitudes (e.g., organizational commitment) and behaviors (e.g., job performance, organizational citizenship behavior), such that employees¿ tendencies to respond more positively to higher procedural fairness are stronger when outcome fairness is relatively low. In the present studies, we posited that people¿s uncertainty about their standing as organizational members would have a moderating influence on this interactive relationship between procedural fairness and outcome fairness, in that the interactive relationship was expected to be more pronounced when uncertainty was high. Using different operationalizations of uncertainty of standing (i.e., length of tenure as a proxy, along with self-reports and coworkers¿ reports), we found support for this hypothesis in 4 field studies spanning 3 different countries. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)
U2 - 10.1037/a0017866
DO - 10.1037/a0017866
M3 - Article
SN - 0021-9010
VL - 95
SP - 291
EP - 304
JO - Journal of Applied Psychology
JF - Journal of Applied Psychology
IS - 2
ER -