When do procedural fairness and outcome fairness interact to influence employees' work attitudes and behaviors? The moderation effect of uncertainty.

D (David) De Cremer, J Brockner, A Fishman, Marius van Dijke, W (Woody) van Olffen, DM Mayer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prior research has shown that procedural fairness interacts with outcome fairness to influence employees¿ work attitudes (e.g., organizational commitment) and behaviors (e.g., job performance, organizational citizenship behavior), such that employees¿ tendencies to respond more positively to higher procedural fairness are stronger when outcome fairness is relatively low. In the present studies, we posited that people¿s uncertainty about their standing as organizational members would have a moderating influence on this interactive relationship between procedural fairness and outcome fairness, in that the interactive relationship was expected to be more pronounced when uncertainty was high. Using different operationalizations of uncertainty of standing (i.e., length of tenure as a proxy, along with self-reports and coworkers¿ reports), we found support for this hypothesis in 4 field studies spanning 3 different countries. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)291-304
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume95
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Research programs

  • RSM S&E

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When do procedural fairness and outcome fairness interact to influence employees' work attitudes and behaviors? The moderation effect of uncertainty.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this