Which subgroups of patients with non-specific neck pain are more likely to benefit from spinal manipulation therapy, physiotherapy, or usual care?

Jasper Schellingerhout, Arianne Verhagen, MW Heymans, JJM Pool, Frieke Vonk, Bart Koes, HCW Vet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this study is 10 identify subgroups of patients with non-specific neck pain who are more likely to benefit from either physiotherapy, spinal manipulation therapy, or usual care, on the short- and long-term. Data of three recently finished randomised controlled trials, with similar design and setting, were combined. The combined study population consisted of 329 patients with non-specific neck pain in an adult (18-70 years) primary care population in the Netherlands. The primary outcome measure was global perceived recovery and was measured at the end of the treatment period and after 52 weeks of follow-up. Fourteen candidate variables were selected for the analysis. Predictors were identified by multivariable logistic regression analysis and were tested for interaction with treatment. Based on the multivariable models with interaction terms a decision model for treatment choice was developed. The analysis revealed three predictors for recovery of which the effect is modified by treatment: pain intensity (0-10 scale) in the short-term model, age and (no) accompanying low back pain in the long-term model. With these predictors a clinically relevant improvement in recovery rate (up to 25% improvement) can be established in patients receiving a tailored instead of a non-advised treatment. In conclusion we identified three characteristics that facilitate a deliberate treatment choice, to optimise benefit of treatment in patients with non-specific neck pain: age, pain intensity, and (no) accompanying low back pain. (C) 2008 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)670-680
Number of pages11
JournalPain
Volume139
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Cite this