Why have recent trials of neuroprotective agents in head injury failed to show convincing efficacy?. A pragmatic analysis and theoretical considerations

AIR (Arne) Maas; Ewout Steyerberg; G Murray; A Beathmann; LF Marshall; GM Teasdale

doi:10.1097/00006123-199906000-00076

Why have recent trials of neuroprotective agents in head injury failed to show convincing efficacy?. A pragmatic analysis and theoretical considerations

AIR (Arne) Maas, Ewout Steyerberg, G Murray, A Beathmann, LF Marshall, GM Teasdale

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

130 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	Undefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)	1286-1298
Number of pages	13
Journal	Neurosurgery
Volume	44
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199906000-00076
Publication status	Published - 1999

Access to Document

10.1097/00006123-199906000-00076

http://hdl.handle.net/1765/72859

Cite this

@article{7f7ddbfec01e43738be58ae1a5a8d140,

title = "Why have recent trials of neuroprotective agents in head injury failed to show convincing efficacy?. A pragmatic analysis and theoretical considerations",

author = "Maas, {AIR (Arne)} and Ewout Steyerberg and G Murray and A Beathmann and LF Marshall and GM Teasdale",

year = "1999",

doi = "10.1097/00006123-199906000-00076",

language = "Undefined/Unknown",

volume = "44",

pages = "1286--1298",

journal = "Neurosurgery",

issn = "0148-396X",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why have recent trials of neuroprotective agents in head injury failed to show convincing efficacy?. A pragmatic analysis and theoretical considerations

AU - Maas, AIR (Arne)

AU - Steyerberg, Ewout

AU - Murray, G

AU - Beathmann, A

AU - Marshall, LF

AU - Teasdale, GM

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

U2 - 10.1097/00006123-199906000-00076

DO - 10.1097/00006123-199906000-00076

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 1286

EP - 1298

JO - Neurosurgery

JF - Neurosurgery

SN - 0148-396X

IS - 6

ER -