TY - JOUR
T1 - Working through childhood trauma-related interpersonal patterns in psychodynamic treatment
T2 - An evidence-based case study
AU - Van Nieuwenhove, Kimberly
AU - Truijens, Femke
AU - Meganck, Reitske
AU - Cornelis, Shana
AU - Desmet, Mattias
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Psychological Association.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Objective: Adult interpersonal difficulties are considered 1 of the core consequences of childhood trauma exposure. However, research concerning the nature of interpersonal patterns associated with childhood trauma is scarce. The aim of this case study of a supportive-expressive psychodynamic therapy with a woman with a traumatic background, is to provide a detailed understanding of the nature of interpersonal patterns at the beginning and throughout therapy, and to provide an in-depth investigation of the therapeutic process. Method: The Core Conflictual Relationship Theme method (Luborsky & Crits- Christoph, 1998) and the Penn Adherence/Competence Scale for Supportive Expressive Dynamic Psychotherapy (Barber & Critis-Christoph, 1996) were applied to study dominant interpersonal patterns and therapeutic interventions, respectively. Results: At the beginning of therapy, the patient was unable to safely express herself because others were perceived as critical and rejecting. This relationship pattern originated in her primary (traumatic) childhood relationships and was repeated in her adult relationships. As treatment progresses, the patient aspired more proactively to assert herself and felt more self-confident in interactions, although she consistently perceived the reactions of others in a negative way. The neutral, acknowledging and empowering attitude of the therapist created a new relational experience, through which change (on the interpersonal level) appears to be achieved. Conclusions: We conclude that to adequately address interpersonal difficulties in therapy, it is fundamental to recognize dominant interpersonal patterns and to apprehend their dynamics within the broader context of the case.
AB - Objective: Adult interpersonal difficulties are considered 1 of the core consequences of childhood trauma exposure. However, research concerning the nature of interpersonal patterns associated with childhood trauma is scarce. The aim of this case study of a supportive-expressive psychodynamic therapy with a woman with a traumatic background, is to provide a detailed understanding of the nature of interpersonal patterns at the beginning and throughout therapy, and to provide an in-depth investigation of the therapeutic process. Method: The Core Conflictual Relationship Theme method (Luborsky & Crits- Christoph, 1998) and the Penn Adherence/Competence Scale for Supportive Expressive Dynamic Psychotherapy (Barber & Critis-Christoph, 1996) were applied to study dominant interpersonal patterns and therapeutic interventions, respectively. Results: At the beginning of therapy, the patient was unable to safely express herself because others were perceived as critical and rejecting. This relationship pattern originated in her primary (traumatic) childhood relationships and was repeated in her adult relationships. As treatment progresses, the patient aspired more proactively to assert herself and felt more self-confident in interactions, although she consistently perceived the reactions of others in a negative way. The neutral, acknowledging and empowering attitude of the therapist created a new relational experience, through which change (on the interpersonal level) appears to be achieved. Conclusions: We conclude that to adequately address interpersonal difficulties in therapy, it is fundamental to recognize dominant interpersonal patterns and to apprehend their dynamics within the broader context of the case.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061077022&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/tra0000438
DO - 10.1037/tra0000438
M3 - Article
C2 - 30714790
AN - SCOPUS:85061077022
JO - Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy
JF - Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy
SN - 1942-9681
ER -